SAZȘ.Com.n… 2020

Apărut ca virus nou dintr-o familie virală veche, replicat pe un purtător veteran, secular, evoluat milenar, noul virus cu coroniță și bărbiță, pare uns cu toate ungerile.

Desigur, analogiile nu sunt perfecte, mai ales în domeniul sistemelor vii, al vieții sociale, spirituale.

Un virus este o formă elementară a lumii vii, parte dintr-un ecosistem, cu efecte benefice pe termen foarte lung, cu efecte nefaste, patologice, chiar letale, pe termen scurt, acut.

Virusul nu poate supraviețui, nu se poate manifesta, nici măcar exista, în afara sistemului. Și totuși, prin tot ce face, prin însăși definiția existenței și vieții sale, el infecteză, dăunează, omoară. Așa e lumea în care trăim. 

În desele ocazii în care găsește o gazdă tarată, incapabilă să reziste, odată cu gazda, moare și virusul. Nu poate altfel. Apoi, ciclul se reia. Din formă previabilă, învie, ucide și moare. Ca tot ce e viral și viu. Sunt viruși și virusuri. Unele informatice, altele biologice. Unele dau infodemie, altele epidemie.

Or fi și virusuri spirituale. Septicemii și pandemii culturale și spirituale.

Organismele vii au un sistem de apărare, îndelung exersat – sistemul imunitar – cu mijloace nespecifice, cu imunitate celulară și umorală, specifice.

Din nefericire, ceea ce ar trebui să ne apere, în fața unui atac, unei invazii, poate fi capabil s-o facă, în cazul unei reacții proporționale, lucide, informate, sau poate apărea o reacție anergică – aproape absentă, grevată de metehne cronice, sau una exagerată – hiperergică, alergică, inflamatorie, agregantă și coagulantă, diseminată, determinată de o sensibilitate patologică.

Totuși, sistemul imunitar nu este decât o verigă în fortificațiile apărării. Tratamentul etiologic, patogenic, igieno-dietetic, imunologic, epidemiologic – profilactic, prin excelență – fac parte din arsenalul terapeutic eficient.

Să ne imaginăm aplicațiile sale în domeniul cultural, spiritual.

Or, ceea ce se întâmplă, în cazul focarului nostru, nu este decât un conflict intern, între un virus cu coroniță și alte abțibilduri – pe de o parte – și gazda, vectorul său, care are o imunitate foarte solidă, exersată și evoluată îndelung. Atât vectorul – liliacul sau pangolinul – cât  și virusul, pot fi surse de contaminare. 

O primă morală: Păstrați-vă curați. Nu frecventați piețe insalubre.

Alta ar fi aceea de a păstra distanța profilactică și epidemiologică corectă. Orice implicare poate să vă epuizeze până la anergie, sau să vă inflameze până la reacții paradoxale și regretabile, tardiv. Sepsis, boli autoimune și de sistem, alergii… Bube, de sus până jos.

O altă morală ar fi aceea de a ne păstra igiena mintală și spirituală în condiții de sănătate exemplară. Sănătatea surselor de informare, a proceselor cognitive de evaluare, a concluziilor sănătoase, pragmatice.

Un proces infecțios, un conflict imunologic, ca orice alt conflict, predispune în primă intenție la polarizare, la atașament partinic. Nu e o reacție matură. 

Să ne consolidăm propria apărare specifică și nespecifică, să lucrăm la mijloacele profilactice, iar la primul contact cu un agent patogen, să ieșim mai puternici, maturi, înțelepți!

Despre Sorin Săndulache
Senior Neurolog, PhD antropologie medicală, licențiat în teologie protestantă, master în psihoterapie. Tânăr pensionar!

38 Responses to SAZȘ.Com.n… 2020

  1. polihronu says:

    Vorba vectorului nostru: viata gaseste o cale 🙂

  2. Sorin Săndulache says:

    👍

    🤩

  3. stranepotul says:

    Un articol bun. 5 stele.

  4. Sorin Săndulache says:

    Bun revenit!
    Mulțumesc!

  5. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    High technology, superior art, great temples, great achievements and even great empires. It’s all a result of civilization, and casting aside civilization would be a waste of potential. Right?

    To answer that, the first question we need to ask is: where and why did civilization appear?

    Where did they first appear? The oldest civilizations were located in the Middle East and North Africa, in the Fertile Crescent, the meeting point between Africa, Europe and Asia.

    Why did they appear? When the humans of Africa, Europe and Asia met they also mixed. The peoples perfectly adapted for life in Africa mixed with the peoples perfectly adapted for life in Europe and Asia, and the result was a hybridized man not perfectly adapted for life anywhere. They had no natural habitat, because they were a cross between peoples from vastly different places.

    They were hardly complete failures, surely they too could hunt and survive, but not as well as those perfectly adapted to their environment. So instead more and more of them resorted to agriculture. I may add that Europeans too resorted to agriculture some times, in the Stone Age, when they had no other choice, so this was not a new idea. This was how they had done it in the past, when things went wrong. However, they always cast aside agriculture again when they could, because they understood and felt that living as hunter-gatherers was better. The hybrids in the Middle East though kept it, and with time agriculture almost close to completely replaced hunting and gathering.

    This however didn’t repair their problem with not having any environment perfectly adapted for themselves. On the contrary, agriculture made it even worse. Their farmer diet made their jaws shrink (which is why people today no longer have room for their “wisdom teeth”), their skeletons became weaker, their brains shrunk and they even became more “slave-minded”.

    Let me elaborate on that a bit, before we continue: with agriculture came malnutrition (because their diet became less varied), slavery (because some people took control of the land and needed workers), war (because when famine struck one place, they tended to just go to another place and take their food instead, by force) and tyranny (because one guy always took control of it all). So in order to survive in these farmer areas of the Middle East/North Africa, most people had to be obedient, even submissive. You also didn’t need very much intelligence: your local tyrant gave you what you needed to survive, in return for your slave-service in the fields.

    Yes, this is how social classes appeared. They had no such division as hunter-gatherers, it was not needed at all, and would have been just a destructive nuisance. Free peoples don’t have social classes. But in the farmer areas some people ruled, others slaved and some got their food by enforcing slavery.

    I can add that the English term “Lord” actually means “Warden of the Bread”, from Old English hleward (“bread-warden”). He was that tyrant who kept and distributed the bread to his warriors and slaves. The Lord. You don’t do as he wishes? No bread for you…

    These increasingly inadequate human beings built larger and larger communities, because although inferior to the hunter-gatherer diet, the farmer diet allowed them to feed many more. And voila! Civilization appeared, as a result of agriculture! They built entire towns to house the tyrant and his administration, surrounded by the farms of his slaves/workers. The hybrids constructed an artificial environment for themselves, because they didn’t fit in perfectly in any natural environment.

    ***

    You are right though: no hunter-gather ever invented combustion engines, satellite navigation systems, advanced computers or anything like that. You can argue that they didn’t because they were “primitive” and because we are so much smarter than them, but you would be wrong to think so. Our hunter-gatherer forebears were not only stronger than us and had more powerful bones, but they also had bigger brains and were smarter than we are today.

    Let me explain….

    All this advanced technology that we surround ourselves with today, not only is it unsustainable, considering the amount of resources – often finite resources – we need to spend to make them, but it is basically like a wheelchair. Not just a simple wheelchair that needs to be pushed by someone. No! A high tech, fancy wheelchair with suspension, electric engines and inflatable tyres, sure.

    Driving around in a modern wheelchair like that is probably fun, but you don’t invent such a thing unless you need one. Yeah. If you can walk, you wont build yourself any type of walking aids to begin with. And this is the core of the problem: our forebears could walk, but because we become increasingly unable to walk on our own two feet, we keep inventing all these different types of walking aids. Not because we are smarter than them, but because we become more and more dependent on such aids.

    The wheelchair is just an example, of course: this applies to everything we invent or invented, to help us survive. Even a script was such a “wheelchair”. When asked by the Romans why the Gauls didn’t have a script of their own, letters to write down things with, the Gauls replied that they didn’t want to reduce their ability to remember. They argued that if you got used to writing down things, then you would no longer need to remember it, and therefore you would become more and more incapable of remembering – in the end anything. You would become more stupid.

    Would you even want a book to write things down in, if you knew you could remember everything you wanted? What a waste! History, mythology, heraldic, herb lore, geography, etc. etc. etc. all remembered by heart and taught to others orally. Yeah, they Gauls could “walk”. They didn’t need this “wheelchair”. Not because they were inferior to the Romans, but actually because they were superior to the (more civilized….) Romans.

    And yes, they were inferior to the Gauls because they were more civilized.

    But in reality the inferior often beats the superior, as history has shown us over and over again, because quality is no match for treachery, lies, deceit and often also quantity. Alas! Civilization is a horrible and destructive force, but it spreads like fire in dry grass.

    ***

    When we then enter the topic of “wasted potential” it starts to become more interesting, I think. Because what defines a “great achievement”? Walking on the Moon? Modern computers? Atomic bombs? Combustion engines? Sky scrapers? What?

    You can justly argue that all such things are great achievements, but have you calculated in the costs of these achievements? Is it worth to degrade our species to such a degree as we have done by now, with civilization, to achieve that? Is it worth to risk our own destruction – through a slow suicide by degeneration and eventually starvation due to a devastated environment on Earth (caused by our civilization itself!) – for such things?

    As part of this civilization we have something called auto-domestication, where we basically domesticate ourselves more and more, as time goes by. Yes, this is what cause the weakening of our skeleton and the reduction in brain size. We have seen it happen in all the animals we domesticated, and we see it happen in ourselves too. Compare one of those little rat-like dogs women carry around in their purses today or a bulldog or something like that to a wolf, and you get an idea of how we have become compared to our forebears. Because of auto-domestication.

    Had we instead created and kept a system where we would have seen a gradual improvement of our species over the ages…. that would have been a great achievement. Sounds like an Utopian idea, right?

    Except it isn’t. That’s what we had, when we were hunter-gatherers…. we cultivated courage, kindness, honesty, intelligence, loyalty, strength, speed, skill and beauty/health.

    Despair not! Many of us still do, but they fight an uphill struggle, because they still auto-domesticate themselves, by living in an agricultural civilization. Let me give you an example: we still have hunters who opt to use bow and arrow instead of a modern rifle. Why? Solely because it’s more challenging. They pick the hard route to their goal. They elect to do it the hard way. This is still, thankfully, in our Native European spirit: to walk uphill even when we don’t have to, simply because we want to challenge ourselves and improve. We are broken by civilization, but not that broken, and not completely broken. Yet.

    So you might say that throwing away Moon journeys and fancy fast cars with air condition, and all else that technocrats love to think might come in the future, is a wasted potential, but look instead at yourself, and understand that you have potential too, as an individual and we as a species. Is it not a wasted potential to throw away your ability to walk only because high tech wheelchairs exist, and you really want to keep the one you have? Is it not a wasted potential to throw away your ability to remember the exact position of all the stars on the night sky, only because you can download some software telling you the same?

    But now you must listen carefully to what I say: Is it not a wasted potential to throw away your ability to not be greedy, envious, petty, hateful, dishonest and coward?

    The greatness of man does not lie in his ability to make fancy high tech wheelchairs, but in his ability to walk!

    ***

    We can still walk. Yes, we have driven wheelchairs for thousands of years now, metaphorically speaking, but we have not yet lost our ability to walk. At least not all of us. This civilization was imposed on us, we didn’t create it. We never needed it. Others did, yes, but we – Native Europeans – did not – and we still don’t. Nor do the Native Africans or the Native Americans need it. Probably not the Native Asians either, although I am not sure if any of them are left, as such. They are all very mixed by now.

    Only hybrids need civilization to survive, because they are not adapted to survival in any natural habitat. Civilization is their (artificial) habitat. Without it, they wont survive in the long run.

    Civilization isn’t going away though, anytime soon, and more and more people become hybridized. This is an inevitable consequence of having an artificial habitat where everyone can survive. In the end, everyone in this civilization will be hybrids. Everyone will depend on its survival. Everyone will need civilization in order to survive….

    Yes, either civilization goes away, or we go away. That’s your options, “Men of the West”.

    ***

    This brings us to the topic of survival. Because the only way mankind, as a species, can survive civilization is by letting civilization destroy itself and everyone in it. Only those who elect to not participate, only those who elect to live not as a part of civilization, can stand any hope of survival – and they must survive not only the intrusions of civilization, but also its probably dramatic fall.

    And a dramatic fall will come, in one way or the other. When many live cramped together, like humans do in cities, viruses will mutate a lot, and it is only a matter of time before one so deadly it will kill everyone will come from this – bred by our civilization itself. Like a self-destruct mechanism for a cancer on planet Earth. If that doesn’t happen soon enough, civilization will collapse under the weight of all the problems it creates: idiocracy, desertification, crime and not least a lack of resources – especially finite resources. A massive solar storm would also send it into absolute chaos, or a nuclear war. Or something (by most people) unexpected, like a new Ice Age. Only death awaits for the civilized man and his cancerous civilization. Degeneration, decay, destruction and ultimately death.

    What hope does mankind have then? We have hope in those who might survive the coming fall. Before the collapse they balance on a thin edge, over a vast sea of disaster, because they must not be noticed by the civilized man, lest the masses will drag them down; throw them in prison for “thought crimes”, take their children from them, steal their food or even kill them. They must learn to endure hardship before hardship has come. They must become able to survive without civilization, whilst they at the same time LARP as NPCs, so that nobody notices what they are doing. They must become autonomous without anyone knowing they are. They must fake misery, when everyone else are suffering as it all comes crashing down on top of us all. Most importantly, they must stay unmixed, when everyone else mixes, or else they will not even be able to survive in the natural habitat that will replace the artificial habitat of civilization.

    Yes, we have little hope, but a little is better than no hope

  6. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Sunt curios de eventualele comentarii. Nu trec sursa, ca sa scot din ecuație autorul care ar influența critica textului. 🙂

  7. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Pit zice si de bine si de rau despre articol. E ideologia (sau nu e ideologie) noii contraculturi, a rezistentei underground la tot ce exista azi. Respi ge atât stanga cat si dreapta, deși e criticata ca fiind de extrema dreaptă. Dar azi oricine zice ceva de rasa e de extrema dreapta caci e reflex de gandire, e meme reflex.

  8. polihronu says:

    Eu am o singura intrebare: de unde stie autorul acestui text ca e Native European? Ma indoiesc ca si-a masurat creieru’ 🙂

  9. Sorin Săndulache says:

    În timp ce admir faptul că sunteți tot mai integrați, tot mai deplin oamenii timpului, locului și culturii voastre, recunosc – privim cu detașare problemele care vă frământă și vă confruntă. E clar că nu ținem pasul cu voi! Suntem mai așezați, în căutarea marilor sinteze, care întârzie.
    🤩

  10. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Si a facut testul genetic, e blond.

  11. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Cartea nu o pot accesa căci telefonul meu nu mai poate accesa multe site-uri.

  12. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Mulțumesc pt critica textului!

  13. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    E vorba de Varg Vikernes, cel de la Burzum.

  14. polihronu says:

    Nu era o carte, ci textul integral al acestui articol.

  15. polihronu says:

    „testul genetic”

    Aha 🙂 „DNA ancestry tests are BULLSHIT. Don’t trust them, don’t take them. If you want to know what you are, just take a look in the mirror.”

  16. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    M-am prins până la urmă. 🙂 oricum nu am acces.
    E ceva ce prinde formă in Europa. Deodata e ușor de etichetat ca neonazim dar eu zic că e o etichetă rea de dragul de a fi rea. Sa vedem cum evolueaza. Bănuiesc o mulțime de lacune din pdvd științific, dar ca fenomen e interesat.

  17. polihronu says:

    Tipu’ a fondat cit a fost in puscarie o organizatie de paginism pangerman – aia e partea distractiva din nazism 🙂

  18. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Tu le știi pe toate? :)) credeam că e ceva mai marunt, de nișă.

  19. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Sunt tot mai deplin omul limitelor mele, pe care încep să le simt acut. Timpul nu mai are răbdare să stea asezat iar viata mea nu-mi da răgazul si nici inteligenta sa stau prea des cu cartra in mână. Așa că caut scurtături, coduri de trișat. De asta plantele psihotrope sunt light stuff pe lângă ce chestii am facut si despre care nu are rost sa vb. E totul sau nimic iar noetic am nimic, deci nimic de pierdut.

  20. polihronu says:

    Nu, doamne feri! Da’ nu mi-e frica sa intru pe contu’ lui de YT 🙂

  21. polihronu says:

    Sa-ti simti limitele acut e cel mai omenesc lucru cu putinta (cartile bune tocmai asta fac, iti ascut simtul limitei). Scurtaturi insa nu exista 🙂

  22. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    L-au dat afară, acum e pe Twitter. Prin muzica lui m-am atașat de el, indiferent ce idei are. Banuiesc ca face asta ca sa se razbune pe sistem. Da e posibil si sa creada sincer. Partidele de dreapta si altright dezamagesc si joaca teatru. Stanga si dreapta sunt păpușile aceluiași păpușar, așa ca ar putea fi embrionul care sa se hrănească din reacția la asa zisul progresism. Dacă as fi ca acum 10-15 ani as cădea in plasa asta, asa cum am cazut in a religiei.

  23. polihronu says:

    Yeah, prietenul meu cel mai bun din liceu umbla pe la Muntele Athos si deplinge moartea Angliei.

  24. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Există două direcții explicative pt conștiință, cea in care e un produs al creierului si cea in care creierul e o antena scufundata intr-un câmp de conștiință. In primul caz nu există scurtături și toate au fost iluzii.

  25. polihronu says:

    Mesteritul la antena nu e nici el o scurtatura. Pentru ca sa existe scurtaturi, ar trebui sa stim catre unde. Or, dincolo n-are harta.

  26. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Astea sunt marcari de teritoriu pe hidranți iar hidranții sunt gay-ii, negrii, familia tradițională, etc. Hidranții, oricare partid va câștiga, se vor alege tot cu un jet în ochi, in ochiul stang sau in cel drept.

  27. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Poate ar fi bine sa reevaluam cartea tipărită „in contextul actual”.

  28. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Pictorul Louis Wain e un caz interesat. Scurtatura e catre dincolo, nu catre absolut. Era cu un pas dincolo dar nu vroia sa treaca definitiv. Desigur ca viata de aici e pa, nu poți fi in doua locuri. Aici ar fi fost legumă la spitalul de nebuni. Dar ca percepție ar fi depășit condiția de om.

  29. Sorin Săndulache says:

    Revenind la SARZS.Com.n
    Espectativă!
    Așteaptă sancționea Sinedriului!
    Să știe de unde bate vântul oportunismului! Va fi vai și amar!
    Și pt IC și pt biserică!
    Schizmă în toată regula!
    Vor organiza un grup independent!
    Vom vedea! Până unde degenerează!
    E grav, fiindcă nu poate fi altfel!

  30. polihronu says:

    AS,

    Nu institutia cartii tiparite ma intereseaza pe mine, ci autorul care se afla in dialog amplu si profund cu suficienti alti autori si, deci, cu realitatea. Dau in permanenta link-uri si la clipuri de YT (cu stand-up comics, de preferinta) sau la texte cu o exclusiva existenta virtuala.

    Louis Wain o sa figureze in urmatorul meu editorial – multam. Si nu, nici nu a, nici nu ar fi despasit conditia de om.

  31. Amaranthine Sophia says:

    Astept editorialul. Fractalii sunt o constantă a exp. psihedelice. Transa si boala lui Wain au o zonă comună. Perceperea lumii e un proces reductionist, adica sunt niste limite in percepție, cu scopul de a supraviețui fizic, cum ați spus si voi candva. Creierul halucineaza realitatea. Disturband construcția perceptiei de catre creier prin boala sau chimic, ma gandesc că poate vedem mai mult din realitatea cruda a unuversului iar nu cea filtrata si apoi construită.

  32. polihronu says:

    Tot noi am spus aici ca evolutia culturala a omenirii datoreaza cu siguranta semnificativ si patologiei psihiatrice sau psihotropelor. Da’ de vazut adinc in „realitatea cruda a universului”, vedem doar pentru ca punem mai multe capete laolalta, iesim din ideologie si ne uitam atent la cum se invirte zarul.

Lasă un răspuns:

Te rog autentifică-te folosind una dintre aceste metode pentru a publica un comentariu:

Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Google

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Conectare la %s

Acest site folosește Akismet pentru a reduce spamul. Află cum sunt procesate datele comentariilor tale.

%d blogeri au apreciat: